The Method Behind my Pinterest Boards

I'm writing a terribly unsatisfying paper, and I'm procrastinating by using Pinterest. I figured I could assuage my guilt by writing about Pinterest.

Martha Stewart when she was a model in the 1960s!

Pinterest may be the domain of upper middle class Martha Stewart types, but Martha Stewart is totally my idol (she's perfect, guys), and it is an absolute GODSEND for someone like me who obsessively catalogs images and wants to be able to access them whenever and wherever. Is it a website promoting consumerism and an unattainable life? Totally, but I mean, so is the rest of the world, so it's not necessarily a bad thing, right?

Thankfully, Pinterest allows me to catalog the intersection of my two favorite things, fashion and history. There are lots of amazing people scanning and uploading their amazing vintage ephemera collections, so all I have to do is find it and organize it and I have it at my fingertips.

But this is all stuff we already know about Pinterest, right? What about me? (This blog is all about me! No it's not. But it sort of is.) I have about 25,000 pins, 150 boards, and I bet over half of them are related to vintage fashion in some form.

More Martha Stewart!

I'm currently reorganizing my behemoth of a "fashion museum" board, which originally had about 2,500 pins before I got frustrated and decided to redistribute them all by decade. But as I go through vintage fashion photographs, I've realized that some of these images are not like the others. Interestingly, the images I chose of Martha Stewart illustrate these differences. The first photo, where she's standing against a wall and not really doing anything, would go under my "fashion showcase" board. (I went with 1960s for this link because...um...the photo is from the 1960s.) These are other photos from the same board, in case you're super-lazy:

Both images were taken by Chalomer Woods. Woods has some good photographs, but for the most part, his shots are pretty standard studio photos intended to highlight the clothes and the model--not his technical artistry or creative genius. On the other hand, the photo of Martha with the cow would go under my fashion oddities board, because, like, it's pretty weird, let's just be honest here, guys. These are probably some of my favorite boards, because although there were lots of beautiful dresses, hairstyles, and makeup styles from the 1920s-1960s, some of it was just absolutely bizarre. Like wig swimming caps and a creepy crochet helmet.

I also include stuff from less well-known or unconventional fashion magazines--there are a few images on there from Playboy, which, inexplicably, featured its models wearing really cute clothes. (Sadly, the Tumblr blog cataloging these adorable fashions seems to now be defunct.) I don't have any information on who is in these photos or who took them. They're just examples of really weird apparel and accessories.

There were a few photos of Martha Stewart when she modeled for Chanel. I can't find any, but if a photo involves a well-known designer (Chanel), photographer (Avedon), or model (Wilhemina), then it's probably going to go to my fashion muse board. These are my babies. These are like, pure fashion and art and I love them and I wish I could surround myself in a room with these images plastered all over the walls.

Original caption: Model seated on yellow cushion, wearing fuscia dress suit, with green-blue hat with bow, by Emme. Photo Horst P. Horst Condè Nast Archive 1961

This photo was taken by Horst (check), is in the Conde Nast archive (check), and has one major designer (check).

Anne Saint-Marie and the designer Bill Blass, 1960’s

This is a studio photo like the "fashion showcase" photos above, but the bold contrast, unique direction, and inclusion of Anne Saint-Marie and Bill Blass separate it from the others. It's less about the clothing and more about the relationship between the model, the clothing, the designer, and the photographer. We can tell Anne's elegance (more on her later because she's one of my favorite models!), and, assuming the clothes she's wearing are Blass, we can see how he knows how to dress an elegant figure. I don't know who the photographer is, but I think he had a great sense of who these people were and how they worked together. The shot is playful, but it's not overtly silly. Finally, while the clothing is incontrovertibly 1960s in style, the shot is timeless, and the beauty of the garment clearly communicated. Despite the commercial element of the photo, everyone walks away with their dignity intact. 

In closing, I will leave you with this lovely photo of a Dior dress from 1968. Anne's dress in the above photo has got me in a textile-appreciating mood...maybe I will write a post on fabric next? (If I get this damn paper done!)

 

XOXO,

Annie Belle